Don't think Chamberlain is a big deal, he will hardly be a large salary and is non quota. Had we done better (and I know the reason why we didnt) and got Lam and Whitehead for example he would be a back up player.
3 year deal is excessive for a back up quality player. Holmes should have been 1 year deal to prove his fitness. I understand Myler had to get players in but still.
Probably, but if we don't they don't sign and we are two more players down.
Holmes isn't working out, but there is still time.
FC Callum:
Dave K.:
Don't think Chamberlain is a big deal, he will hardly be a large salary and is non quota. Had we done better (and I know the reason why we didnt) and got Lam and Whitehead for example he would be a back up player.
3 year deal is excessive for a back up quality player. Holmes should have been 1 year deal to prove his fitness. I understand Myler had to get players in but still.
Probably, but if we don't they don't sign and we are two more players down.
TnT":1xuw1ilb]Has anyone seen stats for chamberlain against Wigan. I dont feel hes as bad as people make out but willing to be challenged on this[/quote:1xuw1ilb]
12 carries for 72 metres
11 tackles 3 missed
One error
Yes not great but nor were many players stats. Just look at Wigans for the game. Seems to me that some fans seek out scapegoats. Don’t think Chamberlain is as bad as people make out. He’s no superstar but is a stopgap. So perhaps get off his case then go for Fash but make sure you go for someone7
Cuddleclub:
TnT":1xuw1ilb]Has anyone seen stats for chamberlain against Wigan. I dont feel hes as bad as people make out but willing to be challenged on this[/quote:1xuw1ilb]
12 carries for 72 metres
11 tackles 3 missed
One error
Yes not great but nor were many players stats. Just look at Wigans for the game. Seems to me that some fans seek out scapegoats. Don’t think Chamberlain is as bad as people make out. He’s no superstar but is a stopgap. So perhaps get off his case then go for Fash but make sure you go for someone7
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
