I'd agree with that, although Richards may be in there above one of the others.



Personally I like it, the fact that we don't have a big personality in the team like cruncher says make's me think that this is the best option available.



The club really is receiving a change from top to bottom, and I think most of us agree it's what was needed for a long time. Hopefully this rejuvenation can springboard us back to somewhere near the top.

Think you need to watch the interview. Maguire says O'Loughlin could have kept the captaincy.

Dont bite to it Jeff... Any excuse to knock Lockers for BBB.



Having watched the interview, Maguire could sell sand to the Arabs im sure..



See how it goes. Still seems weird

It would be very interesting to find out who the new 'gang of five' are wouldn't it. It could realistically be out of a number of players;



Lockers

Fielden

Richards

Tommy

Carmont

Gleeson

Bailey



All could easily get into that five.

Smacks of someone trying to be too clever for their own good. The captain should be one man only as the figurehead and then everyone else should have the opportunity to air their views anyway. The majority of us have all been part of some team or other and if you're afraid to voice your opinion then you shouldn't be in a team environment.



I've been all for the changes made and it's been great to read and hear positve news coming from the club but this just a rubbish idea. Is it supposed to 'make' leaders out of nothing when the one thing we have lacked for a while is leadership, in which this is essentially the same group of players?

well i certainly think its a big change. Lockers wont get as much stick as he has done in the past, which is a good thing. Will be interesting who the team and coaching staff pick as the other 4 .

Some people don't like change do they!!



You think he'd changed the teams name or something.

I don't think it's weird, just different. Afterall, someone needs to do something first for it to catch on. I think this will be a very good idea.

There should be 13 captains on the field anyway..it shouldnt be left to just one player to fire the team up and give boll0ckings.



If it makes more players speak up instead of waiting for one person to talk then i think its a good idea

stupid idea imo.



1 captain, 1 v/c, and a pack leader.



you cant go chopping and changing skips every week.

each with different ideas prob?

just cause confusion and disruption imo.

Maybe we can whistle down the pit if we're short of a prop as well? Move with the times, gramps.

Why Can't he?