Interesting comment by Arthur regarding Littlewood a player who he seems to rate highly."Ben is my sort of build for a back-rower.He his tall,rangy and once they start to fill out they are hard to tackle especially when they can off load the ball too.
"Bens nearly two metres tall and when he puts on some size he'll be better for it.Certainly he's a player with potential for the club going forward.
With Bentley off contract this year he hardly fits that bill.

Interesting point, what if only one of BA's kids were in the NRL, and the other in SL. Then what would he do?

Easy. Go where his favourite is. Everyone has one, don't they. 

Tempting as it might seem, I think it would be a mistake to try and buy the Arthur's. Any quota spots need to be filled with the best players we can get in the positions most in need of strengthening. Frawley isn't even a starting half back, and for my money we should be trying to develop Connor and Croft as a partnership with Sinfield in the wings. Even if we were confident that Jake or Matt Arthur were players with the ability to provide the finishing touches to the squad it would still be a  risk. What would the other players make of it, if they were dropped for the bosses son? BA might end up losing the dressing room very quickly in such a scenario. 

I don't mind Croft.
We need an organising 7 that can kick us around the park.


I'd happily lose Bentley if have Watkins,Gannon , McDonnell with Palasia and the other aussie able to play there too *if* we can sign the type of prop we have needed since Kylie retired.


Connor can cover most of the backs, Sivo should make an impact next year.
Biggest worry is 7 and 9 atm for me.

Isn't Connor, who has been the most creative player on the park for us this season, exactly that 7. He's completely wasted in any other position. Totally agree about the 9 though.